4.7 Article

The slope of the black hole mass versus velocity dispersion correlation

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 574, Issue 2, Pages 740-753

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/341002

Keywords

black hole physics; galaxies : bulges; galaxies : fundamental parameters; galaxies : nuclei; Galaxy : bulge; Galaxy : kinematics and dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations of nearby galaxies reveal a strong correlation between the mass of the central dark object M-BH and the velocity dispersion of the host galaxy, of the form log(M-BH/M.) = alpha + beta log(sigma/sigma(0)); however, published estimates of the slope beta span a wide range (3.75-5.3). Merritt & Ferrarese have argued that low slopes (less than or similar to4) arise because of neglect of random measurement errors in the dispersions and an incorrect choice for the dispersion of the Milky Way Galaxy. We show that these explanations and several others account for at most a small part of the slope range. Instead, the range of slopes arises mostly because of systematic differences in the velocity dispersions used by different groups for the same galaxies. The origin of these differences remains unclear, but we suggest that one significant component of the difference results from Ferrarese & Merritt's extrapolation of central velocity dispersions to r(e)/8(r(e) is the effective radius) using an empirical formula. Another component may arise from dispersion-dependent systematic errors in the measurements. A new determination of the slope using 31 galaxies yields beta = 4.02 +/- 0.32, = 8.13 +/- 0.06 for sigma(0) = 200 km s(-1). The M-BH-sigma relation has an intrinsic dispersion in log MBH that is no larger than 0.25-0.3 dex and may be smaller if observational errors have been underestimated. In an appendix, we present a simple kinematic model for the velocity-dispersion profile of the Galactic bulge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available