4.6 Article

ARE (PSEUDO)BULGES IN ISOLATED GALAXIES ACTUALLY PRIMORDIAL RELICS?

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 788, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/788/2/L39

Keywords

galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: general; galaxies: interactions

Funding

  1. Junta de Andalucia (Spain) [P08-FQM-4205, TIC-114]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. [AYA2011-30491-C02-0S1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present structural parameters and (g-i) bulge/disk colors for a large sample (189) of isolated AMIGA galaxies. The structural parameters of bulges were derived from the two-dimensional bulge/disk/bar decomposition of Sloan Digital Sky Survey i-band images using GALFIT. Galaxies were separated between classical bulges (n(b) > 2.5) and pseudobulges (n(b) < 2.5), resulting in a dominant pseudobulge population (94%) with only 12 classical bulges. In the -R-e plane, pseudobulges are distributed below the elliptical relation (smaller R-e and fainter mu(e)), with the closest region to the Kormendy relation populated by those pseudobulges with larger values of B/T. We derived (g-i) bulge colors using aperture photometry and find that pseudobulges show median colors (g-i)(b) similar to 1.06, while their associated disks are much bluer, (g-i)(d) similar to 0.77. Moreover, 64% (113/177) of pseudobulges follow the red sequence of early-type galaxies. Bluer pseudobulges tend to be located in galaxies with the highest likelihood of tidal perturbation. The red bulge colors and low B/T values for AMIGA isolated galaxies are consistent with an early formation epoch and not much subsequent growth. Properties of bulges in isolated galaxies contrast with a picture where pseudobulges grow continuously via star formation. They also suggest that environment could be playing a role in rejuvenating the pseudobulges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available