4.5 Article

Leaf δ13C variability with elevation, slope aspect, and precipitation in the southwest United States

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages 332-343

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0973-x

Keywords

carbon isotope composition; elevation; slope aspect; precipitation; C3 and C4 plants

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leaves from several desert and woodland species, including gymnosperms and angiosperms with both C-3 and C-4 physiology, were analyzed to detect trends in delta(13)C(leaf) with elevation and slope aspect along two transects in southeastern Utah and south-central New Mexico, USA. The main difference between the two transects is the steeper elevational gradient for mean annual and summer precipitation in the southern transect. For any given species, we found that isotopic differences between individual plants growing at the same site commonly equal differences measured for plants along the entire altitudinal gradient. In C3 plants, delta(13)C(leaf) values become slightly enriched at the lowest elevations, the opposite of trends identified in more humid regions. Apparently, increasing water-use efficiency with drought stress offsets the influence of other biotic and abiotic factors that operate to decrease isotopic discrimination with elevation. For some species shared by the two transects (e.g., Pinus edulis and Cercocarpus montanus), delta(leaf)(13) values are dramatically depleted at sites that receive more than 550 mm mean annual precipitation, roughly the boundary (pedalfer-pedocal) at which soils commonly fill to field capacity in summer and carbonates are leached. We hypothesize that, in summer-wet areas, this may represent the boundary at which drought stress overtakes other factors in determining the sign of delta(13)C(leaf) with elevation. The opposition of isotopic trends with elevation in and versus humid regions cautions against standard correction for elevation in comparative studies of delta(13)C(leaf).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available