4.6 Article

THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES RESOLVED IN SPACE AND TIME: A VIEW OF INSIDE-OUT GROWTH FROM THE CALIFA SURVEY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 764, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L1

Keywords

galaxies: bulges; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: stellar content; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO [ICTS-2009-10, AYA2010-15081]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growth of galaxies is one of the key problems in understanding the structure and evolution of the universe and its constituents. Galaxies can grow their stellar mass by accretion of halo or intergalactic gas clouds, or by merging with smaller or similar mass galaxies. The gas available translates into a rate of star formation, which controls the generation of metals in the universe. The spatially resolved history of their stellar mass assembly has not been obtained so far for any given galaxy beyond the Local Group. Here we demonstrate how massive galaxies grow their stellar mass inside-out. We report the results from the analysis of the first 105 galaxies of the largest three-dimensional spectroscopic survey to date of galaxies in the local universe (CALIFA). We apply the fossil record method of stellar population spectral synthesis to recover the spatially and time resolved star formation history of each galaxy. We show, for the first time, that the signal of downsizing is spatially preserved, with both inner and outer regions growing faster for more massive galaxies. Further, we show that the relative growth rate of the spheroidal component, nucleus, and inner galaxy, which happened 5-7 Gyr ago, shows a maximum at a critical stellar mass similar to 7 X 10(10)M(circle dot). We also find that galaxies less massive than similar to 10(10)M(circle dot) show a transition to outside-in growth, thus connecting with results from resolved studies of the growth of low-mass galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available