4.8 Article

How closely do the δ13C values of crassulacean acid metabolism plants reflect the proportion of CO2 fixed during day and night?

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 4, Pages 1843-1851

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.002915

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extent to which Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plant delta(13)C values provide an index of the proportions of CO(2) fixed during daytime and nighttime was assessed. Shoots of seven CAM species (Aloe vera, Hylocereus monocanthus, Kalanchoe beharensis, Kalanchoe daigremontiana, Kalanchoe pinnata, Vanilla pauciflora, and Xerosicyos danguyi) and two C(3) species (teak [Tectona grandis] and Clusia sp.) were grown in a cuvette and net CO(2) exchange was monitored for g to 51 d. In species exhibiting net dark CO(2) fixation, between 14% and 73.3% of the carbon gain occurred in the dark. delta(13)C values of tissues formed inside the cuvette ranged between -28.7parts per thousand and -11.6parts per thousand, and correlated linearly with the percentages of carbon gained in the light and in the dark. The 8130 values for new biomass obtained solely during the dark and light were estimated as -8.7parts per thousand and -26.9parts per thousand, respectively. For each 10% contribution of dark CO(2) fixation integrated over the entire experiment, the delta(13)C content of the tissue was, thus, approximately 1.8parts per thousand less negative. Extrapolation of the observations to plants previously surveyed under natural conditions suggests that the most commonly expressed version of CAM in the field, the typical CAM plant, involves plants that gain about 71% to 77% of their carbon by dark fixation, and that the isotopic signals of plants that obtain one-third or less of their carbon in the dark may be confused with C(3) plants when identified on the basis of carbon isotope content alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available