4.6 Article

THE COSMIC BPT DIAGRAM: CONFRONTING THEORY WITH OBSERVATIONS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 774, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/774/1/L10

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: active; galaxies: starburst

Funding

  1. ARC Future Fellowship
  2. ARC Discovery Project [DP130103925]
  3. ANU CHELT Academic Women's Writing Workshop
  4. ESO [084.B-0232A, 084.B-0312A, 085.B-0317A]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24540230, 24103003] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compare a large sample of galaxies between 0.5 < z < 2.6 with theoretical predictions for how the optical diagnostic line ratios in galaxy ensembles change as a function of cosmic time. We show that star-forming galaxies at high redshift (z > 1.5) are consistent with a model in which the interstellar medium conditions are more extreme at high redshift than seen in the global spectra of local galaxies. We speculate that global spectra of our high-redshift galaxies may be dominated by H II regions similar to the extreme clumpy, dense star-forming complexes in the Antennae and M82. The transition to local-type conditions occurs between 0.8 < z < 1.5. We conclude that classification schemes developed for local samples should not be applied at high redshift (z >= 1.5). We use our theoretical models to derive a new redshift-dependent classification line that utilizes the standard optical diagnostic line ratios [O III]/H beta and [N II]/H alpha. Our new line can be used to separate star-forming galaxies from active galactic nuclei (AGN) between z = 0 to z similar to 3.5. We anticipate that our redshift-dependent optical classification line will be useful for future large surveys with near-infrared multi-object spectrographs. We apply our classification line to a sample of gravitationally lensed galaxies at z similar to 2.5. Although limited by small numbers, we show that our classification line is consistent with the position of AGN that have been independently confirmed via other methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available