4.6 Article

MASSIVE QUIESCENT CORES IN ORION: DYNAMICAL STATE REVEALED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION AMMONIA MAPS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 768, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/768/1/L5

Keywords

instrumentation: interferometers; ISM: clouds; ISM: individual objects (Orion); stars: formation Online-only material: color figures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present combined Very Large Array and Green Bank Telescope images of NH3 inversion transitions (1, 1) and (2, 2) toward OMC2 and OMC3. We focus on the relatively quiescent Orion cores, which are away from the Trapezium cluster and have no sign of massive protostars or evolved star formation. The 5 '' angular resolution and 0.6kms(-1) velocity resolution enable us to study the thermal and dynamic state of these cores at similar to 0.02 pc scales, comparable to or smaller than those of the current dust continuum surveys. We measure temperatures for a total of 30 cores, with average masses of 11 M-circle dot, radii of 0.039 pc, virial mass ratio (R-vir) over bar = 3.9, and critical mass ratio (R-C) over bar = 1.5. Twelve sources contain Spitzer protostars. The thus defined starless and protostellar subsamples have similar temperature, line width, but different masses, with an average of 7.3 M-circle dot for the former and 16 M-circle dot for the latter. Compared to other Gould Belt dense cores, more Orion cores have a high gravitational-to-kinetic energy ratio and more cores have a larger than unity critical mass ratio. Orion dense cores have velocity dispersions similar to those of cores in low-mass star-forming regions but larger masses for given size. Some cores appear to have truly supercritical gravitational-to-kinetic energy ratios, even when considering significant observational uncertainties: thermal and non-thermal gas motions alone cannot prevent collapse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available