4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

DksA affects ppGpp induction of RpoS at a translational level

Journal

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue 16, Pages 4455-4465

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.16.4455-4465.2002

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The RpoS sigma factor (also called sigma(S) or sigma(38)) is known to regulate at least 50 genes in response to environmental sources of stress or during entry into stationary phase. Regulation of RpoS abundance and activity is complex, with many factors participating at multiple levels. One factor is the nutritional stress signal ppGpp. The absence of ppGpp blocks or delays the induction of rpoS during entry into stationary phase. Artificially inducing ppGpp, without starvation, is known to induce rpoS during the log phase 25- to 50-fold. Induction of ppGpp is found to have only minor effects on rpoS transcript abundance or on RpoS protein stability; instead, the efficiency of rpoS mRNA translation is increased by ppGpp as judged by both RpoS pulse-labeling and promoter-independent effects on lacZ fusions. DksA is found to affect RpoS abundance in a manner related to ppGpp. Deleting dksA blocks rpoS induction by ppGpp. Overproduction of DksA induces rpoS but not ppGpp. Deleting dksA neither alters regulation of ppGpp in response to amino acid starvation nor nullifies the inhibitory effects of ppGpp on stable RNA synthesis. Although this suggests that dksA is epistatic to ppGpp, inducing ppGpp does not induce DksA. A dksA deletion does display a subset of the same multiple-amino-acid requirements found for ppGpp(0) mutants, but overproducing DksA does not satisfy ppGpp(0) requirements. Sequenced spontaneous extragenic suppressors of dksA polyauxotrophy are frequently the same T563P rpoB allele that suppresses a ppGpp(0) phenotype. We propose that DksA functions downstream of ppGpp but indirectly regulates rpoS induction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available