4.7 Article

Limiting efficiency for current-constrained two-terminal tandem cell stacks

Journal

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 299-307

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/pip.425

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tandem stacks of solar cells have clearly shown their ability to increase the efficiency of solar energy conversion. In the past, the challenge in making these devices often has been in the materials science area, working around the constraints imposed by different materials to meet requirements imposed by lattice constant and bandgap. However, developments in the field of low-dimensional structures; particularly superlattices, may allow genetic approaches to developing tandem stacks of large numbers of cells. The current flowing through such devices will have to be constrained so that it is the same through all the cells within the stack since separately contacting such large numbers of cells is impractical. The series-constrained two-terminal tandem solar cell is compared with the unconstrained tandem solar cell for stacks containing both small and large numbers of cells. As expected, we find that the detailed balance limiting efficiencies for the two-terminal cell are less than those for the unconstrained device involving the same number of cells, due to the constraint imposed by current matching. However the difference is always less than 1.5% relative under the design spectrum. However, the two-terminal case shows much greater variation in efficiency if the spectrum varies from that for which the design was optimised. A relationship is derived between the performance of a two-terminal stack of a finite number of cells and the performance of an unconstrained stack of an infinite number of cells. This shows that the performance of the two-terminal device approaches that of the unconstrained device as the number of cells in the stack approaches infinity. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available