4.6 Article

THE HIDDEN AGN MAIN SEQUENCE: EVIDENCE FOR A UNIVERSAL BLACK HOLE ACCRETION TO STAR FORMATION RATE RATIO SINCE z ∼ 2 PRODUCING AN MBH-M* RELATION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 753, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/753/2/L30

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: star formation; X-rays: general

Funding

  1. STFC [ERC-StG UPGAL 240039, ANR-08-JCJC-0008]
  2. STFC [ST/I001573/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I001573/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using X-ray stacking analyses we estimate the average amounts of supermassive black hole (SMBH) growth taking place in star-forming galaxies at z similar to 1 and z similar to 2 as a function of galaxy stellar mass (M-*). We find that the average SMBH growth rate follows remarkably similar trends with M-* and redshift as the average star formation rates (SFRs) of their host galaxies (i.e., (M) over dot(BH) proportional to M-*(0.86+/-0.39) for the z similar to 1 sample and (M) over dot(BH) proportional to M-*(1.05+/-0.36) for the z similar to 2 sample). It follows that the ratio of SMBH growth rate to SFR is (1) flat with respect to M-*, (2) not evolving with redshift, and (3) close to the ratio required to maintain/establish an SMBH to stellar mass ratio of approximate to 10(-3) as also inferred from today's M-BH-M-Bulge relationship. We interpret this as evidence that SMBHs have, on average, grown in step with their host galaxies since at least z similar to 2, irrespective of host galaxy mass and active galactic nucleus triggering mechanism. As such, we suggest that the same secular processes that drive the bulk of star formation are also responsible for the majority of SMBH growth. From this, we speculate that it is the availability of gas reservoirs that regulate both cosmological SMBH growth and star formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available