4.6 Article

THE METALLICITY OF THE CM DRACONIS SYSTEM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 760, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/760/1/L9

Keywords

binaries: eclipsing; stars: abundances; stars: individual (CM Dra); stars: low-mass; techniques: spectroscopic

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. NAI
  3. PSARC
  4. NSF [AST 1006676, AST 1126413]
  5. Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds
  6. William H. Neukom 1964 Institute for Computational Science
  7. Pennsylvania State University
  8. Eberly College of Science
  9. Pennsylvania Space Grant Consortium
  10. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program [NNX-08AE38A]
  11. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908345, 1126413] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CM Draconis system comprises two eclipsing mid-M dwarfs of nearly equal mass in a 1.27 day orbit. This well-studied eclipsing binary has often been used for benchmark tests of stellar models, since its components are among the lowest mass stars with well-measured masses and radii (less than or similar to 1% relative precision). However, as with many other low-mass stars, non-magnetic models have been unable to match the observed radii and effective temperatures for CM Dra at the 5%-10% level. To date, the uncertain metallicity of the system has complicated comparison of theoretical isochrones with observations. In this Letter, we use data from the SpeX instrument on the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility to measure the metallicity of the system during primary and secondary eclipses, as well as out of eclipse, based on an empirical metallicity calibration in the H and K near-infrared (NIR) bands. We derive an [Fe/H] = -0.30 +/- 0.12 that is consistent across all orbital phases. The determination of [Fe/H] for this system constrains a key dimension of parameter space when attempting to reconcile model isochrone predictions and observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available