4.6 Article

TIME-RESOLVED ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY OF THE M-DWARF GJ 876 EXOPLANETARY SYSTEM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 750, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/750/2/L32

Keywords

planetary systems; stars: activity; stars: individual (GJ 876); stars: low-mass; ultraviolet: stars

Funding

  1. NASA [NAS 5-26555, NNX08AC146, NAS5-98043]
  2. HST Guest Observing program [12464]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extrasolar planets orbiting M-stars may represent our best chance to discover habitable worlds in the coming decade. The ultraviolet spectrum incident upon both Earth-like and Jovian planets is critically important for proper modeling of their atmospheric heating and chemistry. In order to provide more realistic inputs for atmospheric models of planets orbiting low-mass stars, we present new near- and far-ultraviolet (NUV and FUV) spectroscopy of the M-dwarf exoplanet host GJ 876 (M4V). Using the COS and STIS spectrographs on board the Hubble Space Telescope, we have measured the 1150-3140 angstrom spectrum of GJ 876. We have reconstructed the stellar H I Ly alpha emission line profile, and find that the integrated Ly alpha flux is roughly equal to the rest of the integrated flux (1150-1210 angstrom + 1220-3140 angstrom) in the entire ultraviolet bandpass (F(Ly alpha)/F(FUV+NUV) approximate to 0.7). This ratio is similar to 2500x greater than the solar value. We describe the ultraviolet line spectrum and report surprisingly strong fluorescent emission from hot H-2 (T(H-2) > 2000 K). We show the light curve of a chromospheric + transition region flare observed in several far-UV emission lines, with flare/quiescent flux ratios >= 10. The strong FUV radiation field of an M-star (and specifically Ly alpha) is important for determining the abundance of O-2-and the formation of biomarkers-in the lower atmospheres of Earth-like planets in the habitable zones of low-mass stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available