4.6 Article

Karyotype and genome characterization in four cartilaginous fishes

Journal

GENE
Volume 295, Issue 2, Pages 289-298

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00730-8

Keywords

genome characterization; cartilaginous fish; chromosome banding; fluorescent in situ hybridization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different approaches can be used to elucidate the unsolved questions concerning taxonomic evolution in cartilaginous fish. The study of the karyological characteristics of these vertebrates by combining molecular and traditional techniques of chromosome preparation and banding has been demonstrated to be a very effective method. In this paper we studied the localization and the composition of the constitutive heterochromatin by using C- and restriction endonuclease-banding in four selachian species, belonging to two of the four superorders. We also characterized two different types of repetitive genomic sequences in these species: satellite DNA and (TTAGGG)(n) telomeric sequences. Finally, we analysed the nuclear ribosomal gene to determine the number of the nucleolar organizers and their position on chromosomes by using silver staining, chromomycin A(3), and FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization). The results showed a prevailingly telomeric localization of constitutive heterochromatin in the Galeomorphii, the presence of additional nucleolar organizer sites in Raja asterias, an exclusively telomeric localization of the (TTAGGG)(n) sequences in Scyliorhinus stellaris and both telomeric and interstitial in Taeniura lymma. These data, together with those concerning the conservation of the satellite DNA, seem to support the hypothesis that Chondrichthyes have an evolutionary history leading them to the acquisition of large genomes rich in highly repeated sequences and subjected to some selective pressures favoring the conservation of this DNA fraction. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available