4.6 Article

WARM-HOT GAS IN GROUPS AND GALAXIES TOWARD H2356-309

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 762, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/762/1/L10

Keywords

cosmology: observations; intergalactic medium; large-scale structure of universe

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration through Chandra Award [AR2-13016X]
  2. Chandra X-ray Observatory Center
  3. National Aeronautics Space Administration [NAS8-03060]
  4. NSF [AST-0707417]
  5. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a detailed analysis of the galaxy and group distributions around three reported X-ray absorption line systems in the spectrum of the quasar H2356-309. Previous studies associated these absorbers with known large-scale galaxy structures (i.e., walls and filaments) along the line of sight. Such absorption lines typically trace similar to 10(5)-10(7) K gas, and may be evidence of the elusive warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) thought to harbor the bulk of the low-redshift missing baryons; alternatively, they may be linked to individual galaxies or groups in the filaments. Here we combine existing galaxy survey data with new, multi-object Magellan spectroscopy to investigate the detailed galaxy distribution near each absorber. All of these three absorption systems are within the projected virial radii of nearby galaxies and/or groups, and could therefore arise in these virialized structures rather than (or in addition to) the WHIM. However, we find no additional galaxies near a fourth void absorber recently found in the spectrum, suggesting that this system may indeed trace gas unassociated with any individual halo. Though the number of known systems is still small, spatial coincidences suggest that some X-ray absorbers lie in galaxy and/or group environments, though others could still trace the large-scale filamentary WHIM gas predicted by simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available