4.6 Article

Retroviral delivery of connexin genes to human breast tumor cells inhibits in vivo tumor growth by a mechanism that is independent of significant gap junctional intercellular communication

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 32, Pages 29132-29138

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M200797200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism by which gap junction proteins, connexins, act as potent tumor suppressors remains poorly understood. In this study human breast tumor cells were found to exhibit diverse gap junction phenotypes including (a) undetectable Cx43 and no intercellular communication (HBL100); (b) low levels of Cx43 and sparse intercellular communication (MDA-MB-231); and (c) significant levels of Cx43 and moderate intercellular communication (Hs578T). Although retroviral delivery of Cx43 and Cx26 cDNAs to MDA-MB-231 cells did not achieve an expected substantial rescue of intercellular communication, overexpression of connexin genes did result in a dramatic suppression of tumor growth when connexin-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells were implanted into the mammary fat pad of nude mice. Subsequent immunolocalization studies on xenograph sections revealed only cytoplasmic stores of Cx43 and no detectable gap junctions. Moreover, DNA array and Western blot analysis demonstrated that overexpression of Cx43 or Cx26 in MDA-MB-231 cells down-regulated fibroblast growth factor receptor-3. Surprisingly, these results suggest that Cx43 and Cx26 induce their tumor-suppressing properties by a mechanism that is independent of significant gap junctional intercellular communication and possibly through the down-regulation of key genes involved in tumor growth. Moreover, our studies show that retroviruses are effective vehicles for delivering connexins to human breast tumor cells, facilitating potential gene therapy applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available