4.6 Article

THE NATURE OF HYPERVELOCITY STARS AND THE TIME BETWEEN THEIR FORMATION AND EJECTION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 754, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/754/1/L2

Keywords

Galaxy: center; Galaxy: halo; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; stars: early-type; stars: individual (SDSS J091759.47+672238.35)

Funding

  1. Smithsonian Institution
  2. NSF [AST-0908139]
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908139] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We obtain Keck HIRES spectroscopy of HVS5, one of the fastest unbound stars in the Milky Way halo. We show that HVS5 is a 3.62 +/- 0.11 M-circle dot main-sequence B star at a distance of 50 +/- 5 kpc. The difference between its age and its flight time from the Galactic center is 105 +/- 18 (stat) +/- 30 (sys) Myr; flight times from locations elsewhere in the Galactic disk are similar. This 10(8) yr arrival time between formation and ejection is difficult to reconcile with any ejection scenario involving massive stars that live for only 10(7) yr. For comparison, we derive arrival times of 10(7) yr for two unbound runaway B stars, consistent with their disk origin where ejection results from a supernova in a binary system or dynamical interactions between massive stars in a dense star cluster. For HVS5, ejection during the first 10(7) yr of its lifetime is ruled out at the 3 sigma level. Together with the 10(8) yr arrival times inferred for three other well-studied hypervelocity stars (HVSs), these results are consistent with a Galactic center origin for the HVSs. If the HVSs were indeed ejected by the central black hole, then the Galactic center was forming stars similar or equal to 200 Myr ago, and the progenitors of the HVSs took similar or equal to 100 Myr to enter the black hole's loss cone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available