4.8 Article

Causes of massive tropical splenomegaly in Ghana

Journal

LANCET
Volume 360, Issue 9331, Pages 449-454

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09680-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The causes and diagnosis of massive tropical splenomegaly are not well studied, especially with modern investigative methods.. We aimed to identify features that would help local clinicians differentiate between the underlying conditions. Methods We collected prospective clinical and laboratory data on 221 Ghanaian patients with spleen size of at least 10 cm. We identified conditions associated with massive splenomegaly with molecular and immunological investigations as well as routine tests. Patients were assigned to diagnostic categories on the basis of these test results and predetermined criteria. Findings Hyper-reactive malarial splenomegaly (HMS; 91 patients [41%]) and B-lymphoproliferative disorders (48 [22%]) were the most common disorders associated with massive splenomegaly. Of the remaining patients, 32 (14%) had haematological disorders, and in 50 (23%) we could not identify the cause of splenomegaly. Male sex predominated in all diagnostic groups except HMS and tropical splenic lymphoma. Age less than 40 years and absolute lymphocyte count (less than 10 x 10(9)/L) were the only useful and widely available discriminators for distinguishing patients with HMS from those with lymphoproliferative disorders. Interpretation B-lymphoproliferative disorders are a previously unrecognised cause of massive tropical splenomegaly. This finding has major implications for management of massive splenomegaly. Diagnosis of the less common causes of this disorder is usually straightforward, but differentiating between B-lymphoproliferative disorders and HMS can be difficult. HMS is associated with younger age, a higher proportion of women, and lower absolute lymphocyte counts than lymphoproliferative disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available