4.6 Article

ON THE CENTRAL HELIUM-BURNING VARIABLE STARS OF THE LeoI DWARF SPHEROIDAL GALAXY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 759, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/759/1/L12

Keywords

galaxies: individual (LeoI); Local Group; stars: variables: Cepheids

Funding

  1. INAF
  2. IAC [310394, 301204]
  3. Education and Science Ministry of Spain [AYA2010-16717]
  4. ESO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of short-period, central helium-burning variable stars in the Local Group dwarf spheroidal galaxy LeoI, including 106 RR Lyrae stars and 51 Cepheids. So far, this is the largest sample of Cepheids and the largest Cepheids to RR Lyrae ratio found in such a kind of galaxy. Comparison with other Local Group dwarf spheroidals, Carina and Fornax, shows that the period distribution of RR Lyrae stars is quite similar, suggesting similar properties of the parent populations, whereas the Cepheid period distribution in LeoI peaks at longer periods (P similar to 1.26 days instead of similar to 0.5 days) and spans over a broader range, from 0.5 to 1.78 days. Evolutionary and pulsation predictions indicate, assuming a mean metallicity peaked within -1.5 less than or similar to [Fe/H] less than or similar to -1.3, that the current sample of LeoI Cepheids traces a unique mix of anomalous Cepheids (blue extent of the red-clump, partially electron-degenerate central helium-burning stars) and short-period classical Cepheids (blue-loop, quiescent central helium-burning stars). Current evolutionary prescriptions also indicate that the transition mass between the two different groups of stars is M-HeF similar to 2.1 M-circle dot, and it is constant for stars metal-poorer than [Fe/H] similar to -0.7. Finally, we briefly outline the different implications of the current findings on the star formation history of LeoI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available