4.6 Article

Electronic structure and thermoelectric properties of pnictogen-substituted ASn1.5Te1.5 (A=Co, Rh, Ir) skutterudites

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 118, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4926479

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. NASA Science Missions Directorate's Radioisotope Power Systems Technology Advancement Program
  3. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
  4. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Substituting group 14 and 16 elements on the pnictogen site in the skutterudite structure yields a class of valence-precise ternary AX(1.5)Y(1.5) compounds (A = Co, Rh, Ir, X = Sn, Ge, and Y = S, Se, Te), in which X and Y form an ordered sub-structure. Compared with unfilled binary skutterudites, pnictogen-substituted phases exhibit extremely low lattice thermal conductivity due to increased structural complexity. Here, we investigate the role of the transition metal species in determining the electronic structure and transport properties of ASn(1.5)Te(1.5) compounds with A = Co, Rh, Ir. Density functional calculations using fully ordered structures reveal semiconducting behavior in all three compounds, with the band gap varying from 0.2 to 0.45 eV. In CoSn1.5Te1.5, the electronic density of states near the gap is significantly higher than for A = Ir or Rh, leading to higher effective masses and higher Seebeck coefficients. Experimentally, Ir and Rh samples exhibit relatively large p-type carrier concentrations and degenerate semiconducting behavior. In contrast, CoSn1.5Te1.5 shows mixed conduction, with n-type carriers dominating the Seebeck coefficient and light, high mobility holes dominating the Hall coefficient. zT values of up to 0.35 were obtained, and further improvement is expected upon optimization of the carrier concentration or with n-type doping. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available