4.6 Article

THE HI MASS DENSITY IN GALACTIC HALOS, WINDS, AND COLD ACCRETION AS TRACED BY Mg II ABSORPTION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 743, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/743/2/L34

Keywords

galaxies: halos; galaxies: ISM; intergalactic medium; ISM: general; quasars: absorption lines

Funding

  1. Swinburne Faculty Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well established that Mg II absorption lines detected in background quasar spectra arise from gas structures associated with foreground galaxies. The degree to which galaxy evolution is driven by the gas cycling through halos is highly uncertain because their gas mass density is poorly constrained. Fitting the Mg II equivalent width (W) distribution with a Schechter function and applying the N(H I)-W correlation of Menard&Chelouche, we computed Omega(H I)(Mg II) O(H I)(halo) = 1.41(-0.44)(+0.75) x 10(-4) for 0.4 <= z <= 1.4. We exclude damped Ly alpha's (DLAs) from our calculations so that Omega(H I)(halo) comprises accreting and/or outflowing halo gas not locked up in cold neutral clouds. We deduce that the cosmic Hi gas mass density fraction in galactic halos traced by Mg II absorption is Omega(H I)(halo)/Omega(H I)(DLA) similar or equal to 15% and Omega(H I)(halo)/Omega(b) similar or equal to 0.3%. Citing several lines of evidence, we propose that infall/accretion material is sampled by small W whereas outflow/winds are sampled by large W, and find that Omega(H I)(infall) is consistent with Omega(H I)(outflow) for bifurcation at W = 1.23(-0.28)(+0.15) angstrom; cold accretion would then comprise no more than similar to 7% of the total H I mass density. We discuss evidence that (1) the total H I mass cycling through halos remains fairly constant with cosmic time and that the accretion of H I gas sustains galaxy winds, and (2) evolution in the cosmic star formation rate depends primarily on the rate at which cool H I gas cycles through halos.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available