4.6 Article

HST WFC3/IR OBSERVATIONS OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS HOST GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2: SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES GROW IN DISK GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 727, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/727/2/L31

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: Seyfert

Funding

  1. NASA [PF9-00069, PF8- 90055, NAS8-03060]
  2. NSF [AST-0407295, AST-0449678, AST-0807570]
  3. Yale University
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [20090078756]
  5. SRC
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0029391] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the rest-frame optical morphologies of active galactic nucleus (AGN) host galaxies at 1.5 < z < 3, using near-infrared imaging from the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3, the first such study of AGN host galaxies at these redshifts. The AGNs are X-ray-selected from the Chandra Deep Field South and have typical luminosities of 10(42) erg s(-1)< L-X < 10(44) erg s(-1). Accreting black holes in this luminosity and redshift range account for a substantial fraction of the total space density and black hole mass growth over cosmic time; they thus represent an important mode of black hole growth in the universe. We find that the majority (similar to 80%) of the host galaxies of these AGNs have low Sersic indices indicative of disk-dominated light profiles, suggesting that secular processes govern a significant fraction of the cosmic growth of black holes. That is, many black holes in the present-day universe grew much of their mass in disk-dominated galaxies and not in early-type galaxies or major mergers. The properties of the AGN host galaxies are furthermore indistinguishable from their parent galaxy population and we find no strong evolution in either effective radii or morphological mix between z similar to 2 and z similar to 0.05.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available