4.6 Article

THE FIRST X-SHOOTER OBSERVATIONS OF JETS FROM YOUNG STARS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 737, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/737/2/L26

Keywords

ISM: jets and outflows; stars: formation

Funding

  1. European Community

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first pilot study of jets from young stars conducted with X-shooter, on the ESO/Very Large Telescope. As it offers simultaneous, high-quality spectra in the range 300-2500 nm, X-shooter is uniquely important for spectral diagnostics in jet studies. We chose to probe the accretion/ejection mechanisms at low stellar masses examining two targets with well-resolved continuous jets lying on the plane of the sky: ESO-HA 574 in Chameleon I and Par-Lup3-4 in Lupus III. The mass of the latter is close to the sub-stellar boundary (M-star = 0.13 M-circle dot). A large number of emission lines probing regions of different excitation are identified, position-velocity diagrams are presented, and mass outflow/accretion rates are estimated. Comparison between the two objects is striking. ESO-HA 574 is a weakly accreting star for which we estimate a mass accretion rate of log((M)over dot(acc)) = -10.8 +/- 0.5 (in M-circle dot yr(-1)), yet it drives a powerful jet with (M)over dot(out) similar to 1.5-2.7 x 10(-9) M-circle dot yr(-1). These values can be reconciled with a magneto-centrifugal jet acceleration mechanism assuming that the presence of the edge-on disk severely depresses the luminosity of the accretion tracers. In comparison, Par-Lup3-4, with stronger mass accretion (log((M)over dot(acc)) = -9.1 +/- 0.4 M-circle dot yr(-1)), drives a low-excitation jet with about (M)over dot(out) similar to 3.2 x 10(-10)M(circle dot) yr(-1) in both lobes. Despite the low stellar mass, (M)over dot(out)/(M)over dot(acc) for Par-Lup3-4 is at the upper limit of the range usually measured for young objects, but still compatible with a steady magneto-centrifugal wind scenario if all uncertainties are considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available