4.6 Article

ACOUSTIC SIGNATURES OF THE HELIUM CORE FLASH

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 744, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/744/1/L6

Keywords

stars: interiors; stars: late-type; stars: oscillations

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY 05-51164, AST 11-09174]
  2. Worster Family Summer Fellowship fund
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1109174] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All evolved stars with masses M less than or similar to 2 M-circle dot undergo an initiating off-center helium core flash in their M-c approximate to 0.48 M-circle dot He core as they ascend the red giant branch (RGB). This off-center flash is the first of a few successive helium shell subflashes that remove the core electron degeneracy over 2 Myr, converting the object into a He-burning star. Though characterized by Thomas over 40 years ago, this core flash phase has yet to be observationally probed. Using the Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) code, we show that red giant asteroseismology enabled by space-based photometry (i.e., Kepler and CoRoT) can probe these stars during the flash. The rapid (less than or similar to 10(5) yr) contraction of the red giant envelope after the initiating flash dramatically improves the coupling of the p-modes to the core g-modes, making the detection of l = 1 mixed modes possible for these 2 Myr. This duration implies that 1 in 35 stars near the red clump in the H-R diagram will be in their core flash phase. During this time, the star has a g-mode period spacing of Delta P-g approximate to 70-100 s, lower than the Delta P-g approximate to 250 s of He-burning stars in the red clump, but higher than the RGB stars at the same luminosity. This places them in an underpopulated part of the large frequency spacing (Delta nu) versus Delta P-g diagram that should ease their identification among the thousands of observed red giants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available