4.6 Article

VERIFICATION OF THE KEPLER INPUT CATALOG FROM ASTEROSEISMOLOGY OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 738, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/738/2/L28

Keywords

stars: fundamental parameters; stars: interiors; stars: oscillations

Funding

  1. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  3. NASA's Science Mission Directorate
  4. KASC Working Group 1
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002041/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/F002041/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We calculate precise stellar radii and surface gravities from the asteroseismic analysis of over 500 solar-type pulsating stars observed by the Kepler space telescope. These physical stellar properties are compared with those given in the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC), determined from ground-based multi-color photometry. For the stars in our sample, we find general agreement but we detect an average overestimation bias of 0.23 dex in the KIC determination of log(g) for stars with log(g)(KIC) > 4.0 dex, and a resultant underestimation bias of up to 50% in the KIC radii estimates for stars with R-KIC < 2 R-circle dot. Part of the difference may arise from selection bias in the asteroseismic sample; nevertheless, this result implies there may be fewer stars characterized in the KIC with R similar to 1 R-circle dot than is suggested by the physical properties in the KIC. Furthermore, if the radius estimates are taken from the KIC for these affected stars and then used to calculate the size of transiting planets, a similar underestimation bias may be applied to the planetary radii.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available