4.6 Article

REDSHIFT EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY VELOCITY DISPERSION FUNCTION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 737, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/737/2/L31

Keywords

cosmology: observations; galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0807974]
  2. HST [GO-12177.01A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of the evolution of the galaxy velocity dispersion function (VDF) from z = 0 to z = 1.5 using photometric data from the Ultra-Deep and the NEWFIRM Medium-Band Survey in the COSMOS field. The VDF has been measured locally using direct kinematic measurements from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), but direct studies of the VDF at high redshift are difficult as they require velocity dispersion measurements of many thousands of galaxies. Taylor et al. demonstrated that dynamical and stellar masses are linearly related when the structure of the galaxy is accounted for. We show that the stellar mass, size, and Sersic index can reliably predict the velocity dispersions of SDSS galaxies. We apply this relation to galaxies at high redshift and determine the evolution of the inferred VDF. We find that the VDF at z similar to 0.5 is very similar to the VDF at z = 0. At higher redshifts, we find that the number density of galaxies with dispersions less than or similar to 200 km s(-1) is lower, but the number of high-dispersion galaxies is constant or even higher. At fixed cumulative number density, the velocity dispersions of galaxies with log N[Mpc(-3)] < -3.5 increase with time by a factor of similar to 1.4 from z similar to 1.5-0, whereas the dispersions of galaxies with lower number density are approximately constant or decrease with time. The VDF appears to show less evolution than the stellar mass function, particularly at the lowest number densities. We note that these results are still somewhat uncertain and we suggest several avenues for further calibrating the inferred velocity dispersions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available