4.6 Article

HOT-DUST CLOUDS WITH PURE-GRAPHITE COMPOSITION AROUND TYPE-I ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 737, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/737/2/L36

Keywords

catalogs; galaxies: active; infrared: galaxies

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [364/07]
  2. DFG via German-Israeli Cooperation [STE1869/1-1.GE625/15-1]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We fitted the optical to mid-infrared (MIR) spectral energy distributions of similar to 15,000 type-I, 0.75 < z < 2, active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in an attempt to constrain the properties of the physical component responsible for the rest-frame near-infrared (NIR) emission. We combine optical spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and MIR photometry from the preliminary data release of the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer. The sample spans a large range of AGN properties: luminosity, black hole mass, and accretion rate. Our model has two components: a UV-optical continuum source and very hot, pure-graphite dust clouds. We present the luminosity of the hot-dust component and its covering factor, for all sources, and compare it with the intrinsic AGN properties. We find that the hot-dust component is essential to explain the (rest) NIR emission in almost all AGNs in our sample, and that it is consistent with clouds containing pure-graphite grains and located between the dust-free broad-line region and the standard torus. The covering factor of this component has a relatively narrow distribution around a peak value of similar to 0.13, and it correlates with the AGN bolometric luminosity. We suggest that there is no significant correlation with either black hole mass or normalized accretion rate. The fraction of hot-dust-poor AGNs in our sample is similar to 15%-20%, consistent with previous studies. We do not find a dependence of this fraction on redshift or source luminosity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available