4.6 Article

SHOCK BREAKOUT IN DENSE MASS LOSS: LUMINOUS SUPERNOVAE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 729, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/729/1/L6

Keywords

circumstellar matter; shock waves; supernovae: general; supernovae: individual (SN 2006gy)

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0807727]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0807727] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the case where a circumstellar medium around a supernova is sufficiently opaque that a radiation-dominated shock propagates in the circumstellar region. The initial propagation of the shock front into the circumstellar region can be approximated by a self-similar solution that determines the radiative energy in a shocked shell; the eventual escape of this energy gives the maximum luminosity of the supernova. If the circumstellar density is described by rho = Dr(-2) out to a radius R-w, where D is a constant, the properties of the shock breakout radiation depend on R-w and R-d equivalent to kappa Dv(sh)/c, where kappa is the opacity and v(sh) is the shock velocity. If R-w > R-d, the rise to maximum light begins at similar to R-d/v(sh); the duration of the rise is also similar to R-d/v(sh); the outer parts of the opaque medium are extended and at low velocity at the time of peak luminosity; and a dense shell forms whose continued interaction with the dense mass loss gives a characteristic flatter portion of the declining light curve. If R-w < R-d, the rise to maximum light begins at R-w/v(sh); the duration of the rise is R-w(2)/v(sh)R(d); the outer parts of the opaque medium are not extended and are accelerated to high velocity by radiation pressure at the time of maximum luminosity; and a dense shell forms but does not affect the light curve near maximum. We argue that SN 2006gy is an example of the first kind of event, while SN 2010gx and related supernovae are examples of the second.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available