4.6 Article

CO(J=1→0) IN z > 2 QUASAR HOST GALAXIES: NO EVIDENCE FOR EXTENDED MOLECULAR GAS RESERVOIRS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 739, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L32

Keywords

cosmology: observations; galaxies: active; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: starburst; radio lines: galaxies

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. NSF [AST-0708653]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the detection of CO(J = 1 -> 0) emission in the strongly lensed high-redshift quasars IRAS F10214+4724 (z = 2.286), the Cloverleaf (z = 2.558), RX J0911+0551 (z = 2.796), SMM J04135+ 10277 (z = 2.846), and MG 0751+ 2716 (z = 3.200), using the Expanded Very Large Array and the Green Bank Telescope. We report lensing-corrected CO(J = 1 -> 0) line luminosities of L'(CO) = (0.34-18.4) x 10(10) K km s(-1) pc(2) and total molecular gas masses of M(H-2) = (0.27-14.7) x 10(10) M-circle dot for the sources in our sample. Based on CO line ratios relative to previously reported observations in J >= 3 rotational transitions and line excitation modeling, we find that the CO(J = 1 -> 0) line strengths in our targets are consistent with single, highly excited gas components with constant brightness temperature up to mid-J levels. We thus do not find any evidence for luminous-extended, low-excitation, low surface brightness molecular gas components. These properties are comparable to those found in z > 4 quasars with existing CO(J = 1 -> 0) observations. These findings stand in contrast to recent CO(J = 1 -> 0) observations of z similar or equal to 2-4 submillimeter galaxies (SMGs), which have lower CO excitation and show evidence for multiple excitation components, including some low-excitation gas. These findings are consistent with the picture that gas-rich quasars and SMGs represent different stages in the early evolution of massive galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available