4.6 Article

SUPER-CHANDRASEKHAR SNe Ia STRONGLY PREFER METAL-POOR ENVIRONMENTS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 737, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L24

Keywords

supernovae: general; supernovae: individual (SNe 2003fg, 2006gz, 2007if, 2009dc); white dwarfs

Funding

  1. NASA [HF-51261.01-A, NAS 5-26555]
  2. HEASARC Online Service
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation [AST-0707982, AST-0908816]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. National Geographic Society
  10. US Government [NAG W-2166]
  11. David G. Price Fellowship in Astronomical Instrumentation
  12. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  13. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908816] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We discuss the emerging trend that super-Chandrasekhar Type Ia Supernovae (SCSNe) with progenitor mass estimates significantly exceeding similar to 1.4 M-circle dot tend to explode in metal-poor environments. While Taubenberger et al. noted that some of the SCSNe host galaxies are relatively metal-poor, we focus quantitatively on their locations in the hosts to point out that in three out of four cases, the SCSNe explosions occurred in the outer edge of the disks of their hosts. It is therefore very likely that their progenitors had far lower metallicities than those implied by the metallicity of their hosts' central regions. In two cases (SN 2003fg and SN 2009dc) the explosion sites were outside similar to 99% of the host's light, and in one case (SN 2006gz) the host's radial metallicity slope indicates that the explosion site is in a metal-poor region. The fourth case (SN 2007if) has the lowest spectroscopically measured SN Ia host metallicity (Childress et al. 2011). It may be possible to explain each of these unusually bright events through some progenitor scenario specific to that case, but a much simpler and straightforward conclusion would be to ascribe the controlling factor to the only physical aspect they have in common-metal-poor environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available