4.6 Article

A POSSIBLE GENERATION MECHANISM FOR THE IBEX RIBBON FROM OUTSIDE THE HELIOSPHERE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 715, Issue 2, Pages L84-L87

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L84

Keywords

atomic processes; ISM: atoms; ISM: bubbles; ISM: clouds; ISM: structure; Sun: heliosphere

Funding

  1. Polish MNiSW [N-NS-1260-11-09, N-N203-513038]
  2. IBEX Mission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The brightest and most surprising feature in the first all-sky maps of energetic neutral atom (ENA) emissions (0.2-6 keV) produced by the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) is an almost circular ribbon of a similar to 140 degrees. opening angle, centered at (l, b) = (33 degrees, 55 degrees), covering the part of the celestial sphere with the lowest column densities of the Local Interstellar Cloud (LIC). We propose a novel interpretation of the IBEX results based on the idea of ENA produced by charge exchange between the neutral H atoms at the nearby edge of the LIC and the hot protons of the Local Bubble (LB). These ENAs can reach the Sun's vicinity because of very low column density of the intervening LIC material. We show that a plane-parallel or slightly curved interface layer of contact between the LIC H atoms (n(H) = 0.2 cm(-3), T = 6000-7000 K) and the LB protons (n(p) = 0.005 cm(-3), T similar to 10(6) K), together with an indirect contribution coming from multiply scattered ENAs from the LB, may be able to explain both the shape of the ribbon and the observed intensities, provided that the edge is <(500-2000) AU away, the LIC proton density is (correspondingly) < (0.04-0.01) cm(-3), and the LB contains similar to 1% of non-thermal protons over the IBEX energy range. If this model is correct, then IBEX, for the first time, has imaged in ENAs a celestial object beyond the confines of the heliosphere and can directly diagnose the plasma conditions in the LB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available