4.6 Article

DISCOVERY OF z ∼ 8 GALAXIES IN THE HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD FROM ULTRA-DEEP WFC3/IR OBSERVATIONS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 709, Issue 2, Pages L133-L137

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L133

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift

Funding

  1. NASA [NAG5-7697, HST-GO-11563.01]
  2. Swiss National Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We utilize the newly acquired, ultra-deep WFC3/IR observations over the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF) to search for star-forming galaxies at z similar to 8-8.5, only 600 million years from recombination, using a Y-105-dropout selection. The new 4.7 arcmin(2) WFC3/IR observations reach to similar to 28.8 AB mag (5 sigma) in the Y(105)J(125)H(160) bands. These remarkable data reach similar to 1.5 AB mag deeper than the previous data over the HUDF, and now are an excellent match to the HUDF optical ACS data. For our search criteria, we use a two-color Lyman break selection technique to identify z similar to 8-8.5Y(105)-dropouts. We find five likely z similar to 8-8.5 candidates. The sources have H-160-band magnitudes of similar to 28.3 AB mag and very blue UV-continuum slopes, with a median estimated beta of less than or similar to -2.5 (where f(lambda) proportional to lambda(beta)). This suggests that z similar to 8 galaxies are not only essentially dust free but also may have very young ages or low metallicities. The observed number of Y-105-dropout candidates is smaller than the 20 +/- 6 sources expected assuming no evolution from z similar to 6, but is consistent with the five expected extrapolating the Bouwens et al. luminosity function (LF) results to z similar to 8. These results provide evidence that the evolution in the LF seen from z similar to 7 to z similar to 3 continues to z similar to 8. The remarkable improvement in the sensitivity of WFC3/IR has enabled Hubble Space Telescope to cross a threshold, revealing star-forming galaxies at z similar to 8-9.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available