4.6 Article

RAPIDLY DECAYING SUPERNOVA 2010X: A CANDIDATE .Ia EXPLOSION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 723, Issue 1, Pages L98-L102

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/723/1/L98

Keywords

supernovae: general; supernovae: individual (SN2010X, SN2002bj); surveys; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. Israel Science Foundation
  3. US-Israel Binational Science Foundation
  4. Einstein Fellowship
  5. Gary and Cynthia Bengier Fund
  6. Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund
  7. US DoE [DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-FG02-06ER06-04]
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1009987] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the discovery, photometric, and spectroscopic follow-up observations of SN 2010X ( PTF 10bhp). This supernova decays exponentially with tau(d) = 5 days and rivals the current recordholder in speed, SN 2002bj. SN 2010X peaks at M(r) = -17 mag and has mean velocities of 10,000 km s(-1). Our light curve modeling suggests a radioactivity-powered event and an ejecta mass of 0.16 M(circle dot). If powered by Nickel, we show that the Nickel mass must be very small (approximate to 0.02 M(circle dot)) and that the supernova quickly becomes optically thin to gamma-rays. Our spectral modeling suggests that SN 2010X and SN 2002bj have similar chemical compositions and that one of aluminum or helium is present. If aluminum is present, we speculate that this may be an accretion-induced collapse of an O-Ne-Mg white dwarf. If helium is present, all observables of SN 2010X are consistent with being a thermonuclear helium shell detonation on a white dwarf, a .Ia explosion. With the 1 day dynamic-cadence experiment on the Palomar Transient Factory, we expect to annually discover a few such events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available