4.6 Article

LOWERING THE CHARACTERISTIC MASS OF CLUSTER STARS BY MAGNETIC FIELDS AND OUTFLOW FEEDBACK

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 720, Issue 1, Pages L26-L30

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L26

Keywords

ISM: clouds; ISM: magnetic fields; magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)

Funding

  1. NASA [NNG06GJ33G, NNX10AH30G]
  2. [20540228]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20540228] Funding Source: KAKEN
  4. NASA [133406, NNX10AH30G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic fields are generally expected to increase the characteristic mass of stars formed in stellar clusters, because they tend to increase the effective Jeans mass. We test this expectation using adaptive mesh refinement magnetohydrodynamical simulations of cluster formation in turbulent magnetized clumps of molecular clouds, treating stars as accreting sink particles. We find that, contrary to the common expectation, a magnetic field of the strength in the observed range decreases, rather than increases, the characteristic stellar mass. It (1) reduces the number of intermediate-mass stars that are formed through direct turbulent compression, because sub-regions of the clump with masses comparable to those of stars are typically magnetically subcritical and cannot be compressed directly into collapse, and (2) increases the number of low-mass stars that are produced from the fragmentation of dense filaments. The filaments result from mass accumulation along the field lines. In order to become magnetically supercritical and fragment, the filament must accumulate a large enough column density (proportional to the field strength), which yields a high volume density (and thus a small thermal Jeans mass) that is conducive to forming low-mass stars. We find, in addition, that the characteristic stellar mass is reduced further by outflow feedback. The conclusion is that both magnetic fields and outflow feedback are important in shaping the stellar initial mass function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available