4.6 Article

A CANDIDATE DETECTION OF THE FIRST HYDROSTATIC CORE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 722, Issue 1, Pages L33-L38

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/722/1/L33

Keywords

infrared: ISM; radiative transfer; stars: formation; submillimeter: ISM

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. Spitzer
  3. Korea government [2009-0062866]
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0008704]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0008704, 2002-0036892] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first hydrostatic core (FHSC) represents a very early phase in the low-mass star formation process, after collapse of the parent core has begun but before a true protostar has formed. This large (few AU), cool (100 K), pressure-supported core of molecular hydrogen is expected from theory, but has yet to be observationally verified. Here, we present observations of an excellent candidate for the FHSC phase: Per-Bolo 58, a dense core in Perseus that was previously believed to be starless. The 70 mu m flux of 65 mJy, from new deep Spitzer MIPS observations, is consistent with that expected for the FHSC. A low signal-to-noise detection at 24 mu m leaves open the possibility that Per-Bolo 58 could be a very low luminosity protostar, however. We utilize radiative transfer models to determine the best-fitting FHSC and protostar models to the spectral energy distribution and 2.9 mm visibilities of Per-Bolo 58. The source is consistent with an FHSC with some source of lower opacity through the envelope allowing 24 mu m emission to escape; a small outflow cavity and a cavity in the envelope are both possible. While we are unable to rule out the presence of a protostar, if present it would be one of the lowest luminosity protostellar objects yet observed, with an internal luminosity of similar to 0.01 L-circle dot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available