4.7 Article

Noncontact three-dimensional mapping and ablation of upper loop re-entry originating in the right atrium

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 746-753

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02036-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study was aimed at delineating the reentrant circuit of right atrial (RA) upper loop re-entry using noncontact three-dimensional mapping. BACKGROUND Various forms of atypical atrial flutter including lower loop re-entry and left atrial flutter have been demonstrated. However, little is known about upper loop re-entry in the RA. METHODS The study population consisted of eight patients (65 12 years, seven men) with atypical atrial flutter. Right atrial activation during atrial flutter was visualized using a noncontact mapping system (EnSite-3000 with Clarity Software, St. Paul, Minnesota) for a three-dimensional reconstruction of the endocardial depolarization. The narrowest part of the re-entrant circuit was targeted using radiofrequency catheter ablation. RESULTS Noncontact mapping showed macro-re-entry confined to the RA free wall with RA activation time accounting for 100% of the cycle length (214 +/- 21 ms) in all eight patients. Two patients had counterclockwise activation, and six patients had clockwise activation around the central obstacle, which was composed of the crista terminalis, the area of functional block, and superior vena cava. The lower turn-around points were located at the conduction gap in the crista terminalis. Radiofrequency linear ablation of the conduction gap in the crista terminalis was performed and eliminated atrial flutter in six patients without recurrence during a follow-up of 3.2 +/- 1.1 months. CONCLUSIONS Atypical atrial flutter could arise from upper loop re-entry in the RA with conduction through the gap in the crista terminalis. Radiofrequency linear ablation of the conduction gap was effective in eliminating this atrial arrhythmia. (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available