4.6 Article

LUMINOUS X-RAY ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 714, Issue 2, Pages L181-L184

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L181

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: clusters: general; X-rays: galaxies; X-rays: galaxies: clusters; X-rays: general

Funding

  1. Mexican government CONACyT [2005-49878]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of X-ray active galactic nucleus (AGN) overdensities in 16 Abell clusters, within the redshift range 0.073 < z < 0.279, in order to investigate the effect of the hot inter-cluster environment on the triggering of the AGN phenomenon. The X-ray AGN overdensities, with respect to the field expectations, were estimated for sources with L-x >= 10(42) erg s(-1) (at the redshift of the clusters) and within an area of 1 h(72)(-1) Mpc radius (excluding the core). To investigate the presence or absence of a true enhancement of luminous X-ray AGNs in the cluster area, we also derived the corresponding optical galaxy overdensities, using a suitable range of r-band magnitudes. We always find the latter to be significantly higher (and only in two cases roughly equal) with respect to the corresponding X-ray overdensities. Over the whole cluster sample, the mean X-ray point-source overdensity is a factor of similar to 4 less than that corresponding to bright optical galaxies, a difference which is significant at a > 0.995 level, as indicated by an appropriate student's t-test. We conclude that the triggering of luminous X-ray AGNs in rich clusters is strongly suppressed. Furthermore, searching for optical Sloan Digital Sky Survey counterparts of all the X-ray sources, associated with our clusters, we found that about half appear to be background QSOs, while others are background and foreground AGNs or stars. The true overdensity of X-ray point sources, associated with the clusters, is therefore even smaller than what our statistical approach revealed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available