4.6 Article

MASSCLEANCOLORS-MASS-DEPENDENT INTEGRATED COLORS FOR STELLAR CLUSTERS DERIVED FROM 30 MILLION MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 713, Issue 1, Pages L21-L27

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/713/1/L21

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; methods: analytical; open clusters and associations: general

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0607497]
  2. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0607497] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present Monte Carlo models of open stellar clusters with the purpose of mapping out the behavior of integrated colors with mass and age. Our cluster simulation package allows for stochastic variations in the stellarmass function to evaluate variations in integrated cluster properties. We find that UBVK colors from our simulations are consistent with simple stellar population (SSP) models, provided the cluster mass is large, M-cluster >= 10(6) M-circle dot. Below this mass, our simulations show two significant effects. First, the mean value of the distribution of integrated colors moves away from the SSP predictions and is less red, in the first 10(7) to 10(8) years in UBV colors, and for all ages in (V - K). Second, the 1 sigma dispersion of observed colors increases significantly with lower cluster mass. We attribute the former to the reduced number of red luminous stars in most of the lower mass clusters and the latter to the increased stochastic effect of a few of these stars on lower mass clusters. This latter point was always assumed to occur, but we now provide the first public code able to quantify this effect. We are completing a more extensive database of magnitudes and colors as a function of stellar cluster age and mass that will allow the determination of the correlation coefficients among different bands, and improve estimates of cluster age and mass from integrated photometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available