4.6 Article

SUPERDENSE MASSIVE GALAXIES IN THE ESO DISTANT CLUSTER SURVEY (EDisCS)

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 721, Issue 1, Pages L19-L23

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/721/1/L19

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F00298X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [ST/F00298X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We find a significant number of massive and compact galaxies in clusters from the ESO Distant Clusters Survey (EDisCS) at 0.4 < z < 1. They have similar stellar masses, ages, sizes, and axial ratios to local z similar to 0.04 compact galaxies in WIde field Nearby Galaxy clusters Survey (WINGS) clusters, and to z = 1.4-2 massive and passive galaxies found in the general field. If non-brightest cluster galaxies of all densities, morphologies, and spectral types are considered, the median size of EDisCS galaxies is only a factor 1.18 smaller than in WINGS. We show that for morphologically selected samples, the morphological evolution taking place in a significant fraction of galaxies during the last Gyr may introduce an apparent, spurious evolution of size with redshift, which is actually due to intrinsic differences in the selected samples. We conclude that the median mass-size relation of cluster galaxies does not evolve significantly from z similar to 0.7 to z similar to 0.04. In contrast, the masses and sizes of BCGs and galaxies with M(*) > 4 x 10(11) M(circle dot) have significantly increased by a factor of 2 and 4, respectively, confirming the results of a number of recent works on the subject. Our findings show that progenitor bias effects play an important role in the size-growth paradigm of massive and passive galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available