4.6 Article

BIG FISH, LITTLE FISH: TWO NEW ULTRA-FAINT SATELLITES OF THE MILKY WAY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 712, Issue 1, Pages L103-L106

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/712/1/L103

Keywords

galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: individual (Pisces, Pegasus); Local Group

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. Participating Institutions
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. Royal Society
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the UK
  11. NSF [AST-0807498, AST-0808043]
  12. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00243X/1, PP/C002229/1, PP/E001068/1, ST/H004157/1, ST/H001913/1, PP/E00105X/1, ST/H004165/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0808043] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  15. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  16. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [807498] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  17. STFC [ST/H004165/1, PP/E00105X/1, PP/C002229/1, PP/E001068/1, ST/H001913/1, ST/H004157/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the discovery of two new Milky Way satellites in the neighboring constellations of Pisces and Pegasus identified in data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Pisces II, an ultra-faint dwarf galaxy lies at the distance of similar to 180 kpc, some 15 degrees away from the recently detected Pisces I. Segue 3, an ultra-faint star cluster lies at the distance of 16 kpc. We use deep follow-up imaging obtained with the 4-m Mayall Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory to derive their structural parameters. Pisces II has a half-light radius of similar to 60 pc, while Segue 3 is 20 times smaller at only 3 pc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available