4.6 Article

THE MASSIVE PROGENITOR OF THE TYPE II-LINEAR SUPERNOVA 2009kr

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 714, Issue 2, Pages L254-L259

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L254

Keywords

galaxies: individual (NGC 1832); stars: evolution; supernovae: general; supernovae: individual (SN 2009kr)

Funding

  1. Hungarian OTKA [K76816]
  2. NSF [AST-0707769, AST-0908886]
  3. Sylvia & Jim Katzman Foundation
  4. TABASGO Foundation
  5. NASA through STScI [AR-11248, GO-10877]
  6. Harvard University
  7. UC Berkeley
  8. University of Virginia
  9. NASA/Swift [NNX09AQ66G]
  10. DOE
  11. NASA [108862, NNX09AQ66G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908886] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0908886] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present early-time photometric and spectroscopic observations of supernova (SN) 2009kr in NGC 1832. We find that its properties to date support its classification as Type II-linear (SN II-L), a relatively rare subclass of core-collapse supernovae (SNe). We have also identified a candidate for the SN progenitor star through comparison of pre-explosion, archival images taken with WFPC2 on board the Hubble Space Telescope with SN images obtained using adaptive optics plus NIRC2 on the 10 m Keck-II telescope. Although the host galaxy's substantial distance (similar to 26 Mpc) results in large uncertainties in the relative astrometry, we find that if this candidate is indeed the progenitor, it is a highly luminous (M-V(0) = -7.8 mag) yellow supergiant with initial mass similar to 18-24 M-circle dot. This would be the first time that an SN II-L progenitor has been directly identified. Its mass may be a bridge between the upper initial mass limit for the more common Type II-plateau SNe and the inferred initial mass estimate for one Type II-narrow SN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available