4.7 Article

ROTATION CURVE OF THE MILKY WAY OUT TO ∼200 kpc

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 785, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/63

Keywords

dark matter; Galaxy: general; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rotation curve (RC) of our Galaxy, the Milky Way, is constructed starting from its very inner regions (few hundred parsecs) out to a large galactocentric distance of similar to 200 kpc using kinematical data on a variety of tracer objects moving in the gravitational potential of the Galaxy, without assuming any theoretical models of the visible and dark matter (DM) components of the Galaxy. We study the effect on the RC due to the uncertainties in the values of the Galactic constants (GCs) R-0 and V-0 (these being the Sun's distance from and circular rotation speed around the Galactic center, respectively) and the velocity anisotropy parameter beta of the halo tracer objects used for deriving the RC at large galactocentric distances. The resulting RC in the disk region is found to depend significantly on the choice of the GCs, while the dominant uncertainty in the RC at large distances beyond the stellar disk comes from the uncertainty in the value of beta. In general we find that the mean RC steadily declines at distances beyond similar to 60 kpc, independently of the value of beta. Also, at a given radius, the circular speed is lower for larger values of beta (i.e., for more radially biased velocity anisotropy). Considering that the largest possible value of beta is unity, which corresponds to stellar orbits being purely radial, our results for the case of beta = 1 give a lower limit to the total mass of the Galaxy within similar to 200 kpc, M(200 kpc) greater than or similar to (6.8 +/- 4.1) Chi 10(11) M-circle dot, independently of any model of the DM halo of the Galaxy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available