4.7 Article

THIRD-EPOCH MAGELLANIC CLOUD PROPER MOTIONS. II. THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD ROTATION FIELD IN THREE DIMENSIONS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 781, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/121

Keywords

galaxies: individual (Large Magellanic Cloud); galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; Magellanic Clouds; proper motions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first detailed assessment of the large-scale rotation of any galaxy based on full three-dimensional velocity measurements. We do this for the LMC by combining our Hubble Space Telescope average proper motion (PM) measurements for stars in 22 fields, with existing line-of-sight (LOS) velocity measurements for 6790 individual stars. We interpret these data with a model of circular rotation in a flat disk. The PM and LOS data paint a consistent picture of the LMC rotation, and their combination yields several new insights. The PM data imply a stellar dynamical center that coincides with the Hi dynamical center, and a rotation curve amplitude consistent with that inferred from LOS velocity studies. The implied disk viewing angles agree with the range of values found in the literature, but continue to indicate variations with stellar population and/or radius. Young (red supergiant) stars rotate faster than old (red and asymptotic giant branch) stars due to asymmetric drift. Outside the central region, the circular velocity is approximately flat at V-circ = 91.7 +/- 18.8 km s(-1) . This is consistent with the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation and implies an enclosed mass M(8.7 kpc) = ( 1.7 +/- 0.7) x10(10) M-circle dot. The virial mass is larger, depending on the full extent of the LMC's dark halo. The tidal radius is 22.3 +/- 5.2 kpc (24 degrees.0 +/- 5 degrees.6). Combination of the PM and LOS data yields kinematic distance estimates for the LMC, but these are not yet competitive with other methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available