4.6 Article

Structure of the Praesepe star cluster

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages 1570-1584

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/342016

Keywords

astrometry; open clusters and associations : individual (Praesepe); stars : activity; stars : low-mass, brown dwarfs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have used the Two Micron All Sky Survey and Palomar Observatory Sky Survey photographic plates, digitized by the US Naval Observatory's Precision Measuring Machine program, to derive proper motions over a 100 square degree, spatially complete region centered on the Praesepe open cluster. Proper-motion measurements spanned the magnitude range R similar to 12-19, which covers most of the lower main sequence in Praesepe. The incidence of H emission from moderate-resolution (similar to2600), red spectroscopy of 434 faint candidate members and 126 field control stars demonstrates that similar to60%-80% of candidates within 2degrees of the cluster center are genuine Praesepe members. Spectral index ratios from TiO and CaH absorption features show a well-defined sequence with J magnitude for high-probability candidates, relative to that of field stars. The inferred membership data have allowed us to estimate Praesepe's mass function and general projected structure for stars with mass 0.1-1.0 M-circle dot. The mass function, when fitted with a power law of the form dN/dm alpha m(-alpha), rises ( alpha approximate to 1.6) from 1.0 to 0. 4 M-circle dot, where it distinctly becomes at (alpha approximate to 0) down to 0.1 M-circle dot. The mass function also exhibits a marginal ( 1) radial dependence, which, when compared with recent N-body simulations, suggests that the core is depleted of low-mass stars. The outer halo of Praesepe is diffuse and shows a slightly elliptical shape among the highest probability members. We place an upper limit on the surface density of escaped members at 2.2 stars deg(-2) outside the limiting radius.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available