4.7 Article

MODELING THE X-RAYS FROM THE CENTRAL COMPACT OBJECT PSR J1852+0040 IN KESTEVEN 79: EVIDENCE FOR A STRONGLY MAGNETIZED NEUTRON STAR

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 790, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/94

Keywords

pulsars: general; pulsars: individual (PSR J1852+0040, PSR J0821); stars: neutron; X-rays: stars

Funding

  1. NASA Astrophysics Data Analysis Program (ADAP) [NNX12AE24G]
  2. ESA Member States
  3. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

I present modeling of the X-ray pulsations from the central compact object (CCO) PSR J1852+0040 in the Galactic supernova remnant Kesteven 79. In the context of thermal surface radiation from a rotating neutron star (NS), a conventional polar cap model can reproduce the broad, large-amplitude X-ray pulse only with a pencil plus fan beam emission pattern, which is characteristic of greater than or similar to 10(12) G NS atmospheres, much greater than the similar to 10(10) G external dipole field inferred from the pulsar spin-down rate. This discrepancy can be explained by an axially displaced dipole. For other beaming patterns, it is necessary to invoke high-aspect-ratio emitting regions that are greatly longitudinally elongated, possibly due to an extremely offset dipole. For all assumed emission models, the existence of strong internal magnetic fields (greater than or similar to 10(14) G) that preferentially channel internal heat to only a portion of the exterior is required to account for the implied high-temperature contrast across the stellar surface. This lends further observational evidence in support of the hidden strong magnetic field scenario, in which CCOs possess submerged magnetic fields that are substantially stronger than the external dipole field, presumably due to burial by fallback of supernova ejecta. I also conduct phase-resolved X-ray spectroscopy and find no evidence for prominent spin-phase-dependent absorption features that could be produced by cyclotron absorption/scattering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available