4.7 Article

A NEW LOOK AT SPITZER PRIMARY TRANSIT OBSERVATIONS OF THE EXOPLANET HD 189733b

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 786, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/22

Keywords

methods: data analysis; planets and satellites: atmospheres; planets and satellites: individual (HD 189733b); techniques: photometric

Funding

  1. Erasmus (LLP) [3505/2012]
  2. STFC
  3. ASI-INAF [I/022/12/0]
  4. STFC [ST/J001511/1, ST/K001612/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001612/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blind source separation techniques are used to reanalyze two exoplanetary transit light curves of the exoplanet HD 189733b recorded with the IR camera IRAC on board the Spitzer Space Telescope at 3.6 mu m during the cold era. These observations, together with observations at other IR wavelengths, are crucial to characterize the atmosphere of the planet HD 189733b. Previous analyses of the same data sets reported discrepant results, hence the necessity of the reanalyses. The method we used here is based on the Independent Component Analysis (ICA) statistical technique, which ensures a high degree of objectivity. The use of ICA to detrend single photometric observations in a self-consistent way is novel in the literature. The advantage of our reanalyses over previous work is that we do not have to make any assumptions on the structure of the unknown instrumental systematics. Such admission of ignorance may result in larger error bars than reported in the literature, up to a factor 1.6. This is a worthwhile tradeoff for much higher objectivity, necessary for trustworthy claims. Our main results are (1) improved and robust values of orbital and stellar parameters, (2) new measurements of the transit depths at 3.6 mu m, (3) consistency between the parameters estimated from the two observations, (4) repeatability of the measurement within the photometric level of similar to 2x10(-4) in the IR, and (5) no evidence of stellar variability at the same photometric level within one year.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available