4.7 Article

SPECTROSCOPIC OBSERVATION OF Lyα EMITTERS AT z ∼ 7.7 AND IMPLICATIONS ON RE-IONIZATION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 788, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/87

Keywords

cosmology : observations; dark ages, reionization, first stars; galaxies : formation; galaxies : high-redshift; line : identification

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. MOSFIRE reduction pipeline
  3. Gwen Rudie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present spectroscopic follow-up observations on two bright Lya emitter (LAE) candidates originally found by Krug et al. at a redshift of z similar to 7.7 using the Multi-Object Spectrometer for Infra-Red Exploration at Keck. We rule out any line emission at the >5 sigma level for both objects, putting on solid ground a previous null result for one of the objects. The limits inferred from the non-detections rule out the previous claim of no or even reversed evolution between 5.7 < z < 7.7 in the Lya luminosity function (LF) and suggest a drop in the Ly alpha LF consistent with that seen in Lyman break galaxy (LBG) samples. We model the redshift evolution of the LAE LF using the LBG UV-continuum LF and the observed rest-frame equivalent width distribution. From the comparison of our empirical model with the observed LAE distribution, we estimate lower limits of the neutral hydrogen fraction to be 50%-70% at z similar to 7.7. Together with this, we find a strong evolution in the Lya optical depth characterized by (1 + z)(2.2 +/- 0.5) beyond z = 6, indicative of a strong evolution of the intergalactic medium. Finally, we extrapolate the LAE LF to z similar to 9 using our model and show that it is unlikely that large area surveys, like UltraVISTA or Euclid, pick up LAEs at this redshift assuming the current depths and area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available