4.7 Article

WATER VAPOR IN THE SPECTRUM OF THE EXTRASOLAR PLANET HD 189733b. I. THE TRANSIT

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 791, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/55

Keywords

planetary systems; planets and satellites: atmospheres; stars: individual (HD 189733); techniques: spectroscopic

Funding

  1. HST [GO-12881]
  2. Origins of Solar Systems [NNX10AG30G]
  3. NASA [NNX10AG30G, 133625] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report near-infrared spectroscopy of the gas giant planet HD 189733b in transit. We used the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 (IIST WFC3) with its G141 grism covering 1.1 mu m to 1.7 mu m and spatially scanned the image across the detector at 2 '' s(-1). When smoothed to 75 nm bins, the local maxima of the transit depths in the 1.15 mu m and 1.4 mu m water vapor features are, respectively, 83 +/- 53 ppm and 200 +/- 47 ppm greater than the local minimum at 1.3 mu m. We compare the WFC3 spectrum with the composite transit spectrum of HD 189733b assembled by Pont et al., extending from 0.3 mu m to 24 mu m. Although the water vapor features in the WFC3 spectrum are compatible with the model of non-absorbing, Rayleigh-scattering dust in the planetary atmosphere, we also re-interpret the available data with a clear planetary atmosphere. In the latter interpretation, the slope of increasing transit depth with shorter wavelengths from the near infrared, through the visible, and into the ultraviolet is caused by unocculted star spots, with a smaller contribution of Rayleigh scattering by molecular hydrogen in the planet's atmosphere. At relevant pressures along the terminator, our model planetary atmosphere's temperature is similar to 700 K, which is below the condensation temperatures of sodium- and potassium-bearing molecules, causing the broad wings of the spectral lines of Na I and K I at 0.589 mu m and 0.769 mu m to be weak.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available