4.7 Article

SINGLE ROTATING STARS AND THE FORMATION OF BIPOLAR PLANETARY NEBULA

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 783, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/74

Keywords

planetary nebulae: general; stars: evolution; stars: individual (asymptotic giant branch); stars: magnetic field; stars: rotation; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. CONACyT [178253]
  2. DGAPA [IN100410]
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN)
  4. Plan Nacional de Astronomia y Astroffsica, [AYA201020630]
  5. Marie Curie program [RG268111]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AYA-2011-27754]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have computed new stellar evolution models that include the effects of rotation and magnetic torques under different hypotheses. The goal is to test whether a single star can sustain the rotational velocities needed in the envelope for magnetohydrodynamical(MHD) simulations to shape bipolar planetary nebulae (PNe) when high mass-loss rates take place. Stellar evolution models with main sequence masses of 2.5 and 5M(circle dot) and initial rotational velocities of 250 km s(-1) have been followed through the PNe formation phase. We find that stellar cores have to be spun down using magnetic torques in order to reproduce the rotation rates observed for white dwarfs. During the asymptotic giant branch phase and beyond, the magnetic braking of the core has a practically null effect on increasing the rotational velocity of the envelope since the stellar angular momentum is efficiently removed by the wind. We have also tested the best possible case scenarios in rather non-physical contexts to give enough angular momentum to the envelope. We find that we cannot get the envelope of a single star to rotate at the speeds needed for MHD simulations to form bipolar PNe. We conclude that single stellar rotators are unlikely to be the progenitors of bipolar PNe under the current MHD model paradigm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available