3.8 Article

The oxidative effect of bacterial lipopolysaccharide on native and cross-linked human hemoglobin as a function of the structure of the lipopolysaccharide - A comparison of the effects of smooth and rough lipopolysaccharide

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 269, Issue 18, Pages 4635-4640

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03163.x

Keywords

bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide); human hemoglobin; oxidation of hemoglobin; cross-linked hemoglobin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The binding of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, also known as bacterial endotoxin) to human hemoglobin is known to result in oxidation of hemoglobin to methemoglobin and hemichrome. We have investigated the effects of the LPSs from smooth and rough Escherichia coli and Salmonella minnesota on the rate of oxidation of native oxyhemoglobin A(0) and hemoglobin cross-linked between the alpha-99 lysines. For cross-linked hemoglobin, both smooth LPSs produced a rate of oxidation faster than the corresponding rough LPSs, indicating the importance of the binding of LPS to the hemoglobin. The effect of the LPS appeared to be largely on the initial fast phase of the oxidation reaction, suggestingmodification of the heme pocket of the alpha chains. For hemoglobin A(0,) the rates of oxidation produced by rough and smooth LPSs were very similar, suggesting the possibility that the effect of the LPSs was to cause dissociation of hemoglobin into dimers. The participation of cupric ion in the oxidation process was demonstrated in most cases. In contrast, the rate of oxidation of cross-linked hemoglobin by the LPSs of both the rough and smooth E. coli was not affected by the presence of chelators, suggesting that cupric ion had previously bound to these LPSs. Overall, these data suggest that the physiological effectiveness of hemoglobin solutions now being developed for clinical use may be decreased by the presence of lipopolysaccharide in the circulation of recipients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available