4.3 Article

Effects of carbonated water on functional dyspepsia and constipation

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 991-999

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200209000-00010

Keywords

carbonated water; dyspepsia; constipation; satiety test; gastric emptying; gallbladder emptying; colonic transit time

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The effects of carbonated beverages on the gastrointestinal tract have been poorly investigated. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effect of carbonated water intake in patients with functional dyspepsia and constipation. Methods Twenty-one patients with dyspepsia and secondary constipation were randomized into two groups in a double-blind fashion. One group (110 subjects) drank carbonated water and the other (11 subjects) tap water for almost 15 days. Patients were evaluated for dyspepsia and constipation scores, and underwent a satiety test by a liquid meal, radionuclide gastric emptying, sonographic gallbladder emptying and colonic transit time, using radio-opaque markers. Results The dyspepsia score was significantly reduced with carbonated water (before = 7.9 +/- 2.8 vs after = 5.4 +/- 1.7; P < 0.05) and remained unmodified after tap water (9.7 +/- 5.3 vs 9.9 +/- 4.0). The constipation score also decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after carbonated water (16.0 +/- 3.9 vs 12.1 +/- 4.4; P < 0.05) and was not significantly different with tap water (114.7 +/- 5.1 vs 13.7 +/- 4.7). Satiety was significantly reduced with carbonated water (before = 447 +/- 146 kcal vs after = 590 +/- 245; P < 0.01). Gallbladder emptying (delta percent contraction) was significantly improved only with carbonated water (39.9 +/- 16.1% vs 53.6 +/- 16.7%; P < 0.01). Conclusion In patients complaining of functional dyspepsia and constipation, carbonated water decreases satiety and improves dyspepsia, constipation and gallbladder emptying. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available